In this class, Alejandro Orrego, CEO at Pirani, teaches us about risk management, why you need to manage risk, how to align risk to strategy, risk treatment, and indicators.
Try Pirani for FREE:
What Is Strategy?
Michael E. Porter defines strategy as a unique and valuable position involving different activities. According to Porter, strategy is not just about operational effectiveness or performing similar activities better than competitors but is rather the choice to perform different activities or the same activities in different ways.
He emphasizes the importance of making trade-offs and choosing a distinct market positioning to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
What Is Risk?
Risk is defined as the effect of uncertainty on objectives. It is the possibility of an event or situation that could impact an organization's achievement of its goals and objectives.
Risk can be seen as a threat or opportunity's likelihood and potential consequences.
What Is Risk Management?
Risk management is a systematic and structured process of identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and mitigating risks to achieve organizational objectives.
It involves recognizing potential events or circumstances that may hinder goal achievement and developing strategies to manage and control those risks.
The primary goal of risk management is to enhance the likelihood of success and minimize the impact of adverse events on an organization.
Why are you doing risk management?
Defensive Perspective
Proactive Perspective
How to align risk to strategy
1. Assess your strategic context
The first step is understanding your internal and external environment and how it influences your strategic direction and priorities. You must identify the key drivers, trends, uncertainties, and scenarios affecting your industry, market, customers, competitors, and regulators. You must also evaluate your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT).
This will help you define your strategic context and the critical factors that shape your risk profile.
2. Define your risk appetite and tolerance
The next step is establishing your risk appetite and tolerance based on your strategic context and stakeholders' expectations. You need to articulate the amount and type of risk you are willing to take or accept in your strategic areas, such as growth, innovation, quality, reputation, compliance, and sustainability. You also need to specify the level of variation from your expected outcomes that you can withstand in each area and the indicators and thresholds that will trigger actions or escalation. This will help you communicate your risk preferences and boundaries to your team and partners.
3. Integrate risk into your strategy execution
The third step is integrating risk into your strategy execution by embedding it into your planning, budgeting, performance management, and reporting processes. You must identify and assess the risks affecting your strategic objectives and prioritize them according to their likelihood and impact. You must also develop and implement risk responses, such as avoiding, reducing, transferring, or exploiting the risks, and monitor and review their effectiveness and efficiency. This will help you manage the risks hindering or enhancing your strategy execution and adjust your plans and actions accordingly.
4. Align your risk culture and capabilities
The final step is to align your risk culture and capabilities by fostering a positive and proactive attitude towards risk among your people and your organization. You must promote a risk awareness, ownership, accountability, and learning culture and encourage constructive dialogue and feedback on risk issues and opportunities. You must also develop and enhance your risk capabilities, such as skills, knowledge, tools, and systems, and ensure they align with your risk appetite and tolerance. This will help you create a risk-savvy, resilient organization that can adapt to changing circumstances and perform better.
Risk Treatment
Indicators
Purpose: KRIs monitor and signal the potential occurrence of risks. They provide early warnings or indications that specific risks might be materializing.
Nature: KRIs are typically quantitative or qualitative metrics directly associated with specific risks. They help organizations proactively manage and respond to emerging risks before they escalate
Purpose: KCIs are used to assess the effectiveness of internal controls implemented to manage risks. They indicate whether the controls are operating as intended to mitigate the identified risks.
Nature: KCIs are often linked to specific control activities. Monitoring KCIs helps ensure the controls designed to manage risks are in place and functioning effectively
Purpose: KPIs are broader performance metrics that measure an organization's overall performance and success in achieving its objectives. While not exclusively focused on risk, KPIs can indirectly reflect the impact of risks on performance.
Nature: KPIs can be financial or non-financial metrics aligned with organizational goals. They provide insights into how well the organization performs and can be influenced by internal and external factors, including risks.
In summary: